Junk Fees: How to Fight Hidden Charges on Travel and Events

The FTC now requires full upfront price disclosure, targeting junk fees in hotels and live events to help consumers compare true costs and dispute hidden charges.

,

Advertising

Most people have experienced that moment at checkout when a seemingly reasonable price suddenly balloons with charges that were never mentioned upfront. Junk fees are the unofficial name for these tacked-on, often vague costs that appear at the final stage of a purchase, leaving consumers feeling trapped rather than informed.

This practice has been especially aggressive in travel and live events, where resort fees, service charges, and convenience fees can add 20 to 30 percent to an advertised price.

The Federal Trade Commission has now moved from acknowledging the problem to actively regulating it, marking a genuine turning point for American consumers.

This article breaks down how these hidden charges work, what the FTC’s final rule prohibits, and how you can effectively avoid or dispute these costs.

Magnifying glass focuses on a neat row of tiny price tags clipped together on a tabletop, illustrating junk fees.

What Are Junk Fees and Why Do They Keep Appearing

A junk fee is any mandatory charge that a business withholds from the initial advertised price and reveals only at the final stage of a purchase. The term covers a wide range of line items, including resort fees at hotels, service fees on ticket platforms, cleaning fees on vacation rentals, and convenience fees at checkout.

These fees persist because they are strategically designed to exploit a psychological weakness. Once a consumer has invested time and emotionally committed to a purchase, they are less likely to back out over extra charges, a fact businesses use to their advantage.

The Industries Most Affected by Hidden Charges

Certain sectors have built entire pricing models around fee opacity. Hotels, short-term rental platforms, and live event ticket sellers are among the most consistent offenders, and they are also the primary targets of recent federal regulation.

Common examples U.S. consumers encounter include:

  • Resort fees charged by hotels regardless of whether the guest uses any amenities they supposedly cover.
  • Facility charges added to concert and sports tickets after a low base price attracts the initial click.
  • Cleaning fees on short-term rentals that are not included in the nightly rate shown during browsing.
  • Convenience fees for paying online, even when no other payment option exists.

These charges prevent consumers from making accurate price comparisons. For example, a hotel advertising $150 per night may actually cost $210 after fees, while a competitor showing $180 upfront is the better deal.

The FTC’s Final Rule: What It Actually Says

In late 2024, the Federal Trade Commission finalized a rule directly targeting deceptive pricing practices in hotels, short-term lodging, and live event ticketing. According to Foley’s analysis of the FTC final junk fees rule, the regulation focuses on two prohibited practices rather than banning fees outright.

The first prohibited practice is omitting mandatory fees from the advertised total price. The second is misrepresenting a fee’s purpose, which is essentially lying about the charge. Together, these rules address the core mechanics of fee deception.

What the Rule Does Not Prohibit

A critical point is that the FTC rule does not eliminate any specific fee type or cap the amounts businesses can charge. Companies can still add resort fees, service fees, and cleaning fees. They simply must disclose the full cost from the moment pricing is first shown to the consumer.

This distinction matters for how consumers should interpret compliance. A hotel listing “$150/night + $45 resort fee” is compliant. However, a hotel that buries the fee in a footnote accessible only after several clicks may still be in violation, even if the disclosure technically exists.

Industry Obligations Under the New Framework

The rule creates specific obligations for the businesses it covers. Here is a comparison of old practices versus what is now required:

Previous PracticeRequired Under FTC Rule
Advertise base price onlyDisplay total price including all mandatory fees upfront
Add fees at final checkout screenDisclose all mandatory fees at first point of price display
Label vague charges as “resort fee” or “facility fee”Accurately represent what each fee covers
Use “convenience fee” for standard transactionsCannot misrepresent the nature or purpose of a charge

As Hotel Dive reports on the FTC junk fees rule taking effect for hotels, the hospitality sector has begun adapting its pricing displays, though the pace and completeness of that adaptation varies significantly.

How Consumers Can Protect Themselves Before and After a Purchase

Even with regulatory changes, consumers benefit from knowing how to defend themselves. The rule shifts the legal ground, but informed purchasing behavior remains the most reliable shield against unexpected charges.

Pre-Purchase Strategies to Spot Hidden Costs

Before completing any booking or ticket purchase, a few practical steps can reveal fees that some platforms still obscure:

  • Compare total costs, including fees, across multiple platforms before committing to any one option.
  • Search the property name plus “resort fee” or “mandatory charges” to find amounts that may not appear in search results.
  • Read the breakdown on the final checkout page before entering payment details, and look for any line item not mentioned in the original listing.
  • Call the property directly for hotel bookings, as phone reservations sometimes allow for fee negotiations or full disclosure.

For live event tickets, purchasing directly from the venue’s official site can often reduce these additional charges, as third-party resale platforms tend to have higher service fees.

Disputing Fees That Were Not Disclosed

When a charge appears that was not reasonably disclosed, consumers now have regulatory language to reference in their disputes. The FTC rule gives complaints formal weight, particularly when a fee contradicts what was shown during booking.

Effective steps to take after an unexpected charge appears include:

  1. Document the original listing with screenshots showing the price that was advertised.
  2. Contact the business directly, referencing that the fee was not included in the displayed total price.
  3. File a complaint with the FTC at ReportFraud.ftc.gov if the business refuses to address the violation.
  4. Dispute the charge with your credit card issuer if the amount differs from what you agreed to at checkout.
You May Also Like

Why This Regulatory Moment Matters Beyond Travel

The FTC’s focus on hotels and live events is only the beginning of a broader shift in how mandatory fee transparency is approached across U.S. industries. Telecommunications, financial services, and subscription platforms have all drawn scrutiny for similar practices.

Furthermore, the framing of the FTC rule, which targets deception rather than the fees themselves, sets a legal precedent that could naturally extend into other industries. The core principle is simple: if a fee is mandatory, the total price including that fee must be what the consumer sees first.

For businesses, the rule creates both compliance costs and competitive pressure. Companies that invested in opaque pricing models now face a landscape where transparent competitors may gain consumer trust. That dynamic may do more to change industry behavior than regulatory penalties alone.

What Stays the Same, and What Readers Should Still Watch For

Regulatory compliance does not happen overnight, and enforcement has limits. As the FTC rule takes effect, consumers should still expect a transitional period while businesses move toward full compliance.

Certain fee types, particularly those framed as optional add-ons, remain entirely outside the scope of the rule. Voluntary upgrades, optional travel insurance, and elective service additions are still legal and do not require upfront inclusion in the advertised price.

The distinction between mandatory and optional charges is where compliance arguments will likely be tested.

Moving Forward With Sharper Awareness

The fight against junk fees has moved from consumer frustration into formal legal territory. This shift gives individuals a more grounded basis for pushing back on deceptive pricing.

Armed with an understanding of what the FTC rule prohibits, consumers can approach travel and event purchases with skepticism and clear criteria for what compliant pricing should look like.

Regulatory frameworks only deliver value when the people they protect know how to use them. That knowledge, more than any single rule, is what changes the experience at checkout.

Watch this short video to better understand junk fees on travel and events and how new rules aim to fight them.

Frequently Asked Questions

What types of industries are primarily affected by junk fees?

Industries like hospitality, travel, and live entertainment are most significantly affected by junk fees, as they often embed mandatory charges that mislead consumers.

How can consumers effectively compare prices before making a purchase?

Consumers can effectively compare prices by calculating total costs, including all mandatory fees, across various platforms to ensure they understand the full financial commitment.

What steps should be taken if unexpected charges appear after a purchase?

If unexpected charges appear, consumers should document the original price listings and contact the business for clarity, while also being prepared to file complaints with the appropriate authorities if necessary.

Can optional charges still be included in pricing without upfront disclosure?

Yes, optional charges such as elective service fees or upgrades do not require upfront inclusion in advertised prices and can still be presented post-purchase.

What principle does the FTC’s rule center on regarding pricing transparency?

The FTC’s rule emphasizes that mandatory fees must be included in the total price shown first, targeting deceptive practices rather than outright banning specific fees.

Maria Eduarda


Linguist with a postgraduate degree in UX Writing and currently pursuing a master's degree in Translation and Text Adaptation at the University of São Paulo (USP). She is skilled in SEO, copywriting, and text editing. She creates content about finance, culture, literature, and public exams. Passionate about words and user-centered communication, she focuses on optimizing texts for digital platforms.

Follow us for more tips and reviews

Disclaimer Under no circumstances will Sit Series require you to pay in order to release any type of product, including credit cards, loans, or any other offer. If this happens, please contact us immediately. Always read the terms and conditions of the service provider you are reaching out to. Sit Series earns revenue through advertising and referral commissions for some, but not all, of the products displayed. All content published here is based on quantitative and qualitative research, and our team strives to be as impartial as possible when comparing different options.

Advertiser Disclosure Sit Series is an independent, objective, advertising-supported website. To support our ability to provide free content to our users, the recommendations that appear on Sit Series may come from companies from which we receive affiliate compensation. This compensation may impact how, where, and in what order offers appear on the site. Other factors, such as our proprietary algorithms and first-party data, may also affect the placement and prominence of products/offers. We do not include all financial or credit offers available on the market on our site.

Editorial Note The opinions expressed on Sit Series are solely those of the author and not of any bank, credit card issuer, hotel, airline, or other entity. This content has not been reviewed, approved, or otherwise endorsed by any of the entities mentioned. That said, the compensation we receive from our affiliate partners does not influence the recommendations or advice our writing team provides in our articles, nor does it impact any of the content on this site. While we work hard to provide accurate and up-to-date information that we believe is relevant to our users, we cannot guarantee that the information provided is complete and make no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy or applicability.